Are Bananas Safe To Masyurbate With

unexpected connections ... for real freedom to discuss

was held on November 15 last year, the Institute of Philosophical Studies of Naples, the annual meeting organized by "The unexpected connections" (http://www.leconnessioniinattese.com/). The theme is, again, that of "unexpected connections" between things, and was entitled: "History, Science, Propaganda."

The meeting was full of guests, so you can not simply sum it up, was introduced by Alexander Scuotto, current president of the Association, and was moderated by Joseph and Roberto Germano. The two brothers Germano, active members of the Association, which does not just talk of "interdisciplinarity" to be beautiful in the conference by appealing to what is practical or not you are sharing in the profound, but instead, really try to practice it. Since only the interdisciplinary, other than a mere statement of principle that commits to nothing, may open up different perspectives, so necessary after last twenty years quest'aridissimo closing curly in their own disciplines, with many honorable exceptions, unfortunately, remains true that "one swallow does not make a summer."

As we have said, can not be summarized, but only to emphasize some aspect, some intervention, and to say something very briefly on the other hand. It would, in fact, a large space to discuss specifically the thesis.

The morning focused on the relationship between myth and history, where Flavio Barbiero has spoken of his hypothesis of the origin of the Atlantean civilization scenario, that is starting to arrive from myth to history, and Giorgio Galli, even presenting his latest book, has, however, the reverse scenario: from history to myth. As the story is "rimitizza," and how the myth is historicized: unexpected connections. Incidentally, the theory ( not not only "hypothesis") Barbiero of the Atlantis is in Antarctica is very close to the truth. Summing up: history and myth, instead of being so opposite, as the rationalist vision claims, entertain each other constants of , and here's the real point, "unexpected connections." All this is part of that feels a need for more than twenty years but that the political events, world trends, the current mental and fatal course of history have so far prevented that was really the light, all persisting in a thousand streams ed'esigenze new criticism that fall outside the framework that has been, by force and without no "freedom" in fact imposed.

The requirement is: the critique of rationalism, criticism and get rid of a series of epistemological paradigms, "modern, now, to be close to the simple fact that there are a thousand and one thing that can not be explained . And then, one or closes his eyes and follows the prevailing academic style asphyxiated, possibly have all the means they want, live well, but is not satisfied internally, or choose to be "happy house", with all the risks and "payments "which is inevitably constrained. Unfortunately, we all were forced to choose, we like it or not.

It is in relation to this issue that took the intervention of the Nobel Prize Brian D. Josephson, who is not "nobodies", but predicted that in 1962 the effect that gave rise to the "Josephson Junction" (http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giunzione_Josephson), linked to the issue of "superconductive" (http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconduttori). Inspired by the case of Anglican Reverend M. Reiss, for he only admitted that the creationist hypothesis could be discussed , without believing in it, was fired. Josephson, in his speech at times humorous, English, but, in reality, very hard, attacking the idea of \u200b\u200b"science" in vogue today, where many assumptions that are not even more such as the "memory of water, cold fusion, telepathy (developed by its Josephson itself), they put the victim in what he calls "the hell of heretics." The idea is that "those who have convictions can not discuss rationally, but Josephson frontal attack and shows that this idea is" the hell of heretics, "not only those who think differently, but also those who only want to discuss hypothesis of "non compliance" with the " diktat "in vogue. It 'a very important one raised by Josephson, and that comes from one of his authority does not only reinforce the need for which it was said above.

His speech raised many questions, even beyond the usual questions made to all participants, demonstrating that it is the "highlight " all of the theme that fail to mention all the "unexpected connections" It is the "trait d'union " among all the issues raised in the meeting. Well, the questions made to him, Josephson said that hopes no doubt that there are possibilities to change, he is very happy every time you do something to that effect, that the real complaint can not last forever, other times that things have changed, but, on the other hand, one must be aware of power of active forces, which should not be underestimated.

At this point, some of my brief comment. It 's so, these forces are dominant, but it is also true that we are at a "turning point" for which continue as we have done for twenty years or so is pure suicide, and we do not believe the "beautiful dance" on " research ", because they did out many lines which could have led to important results. Josephson puts the finger on the problem: but what kind of democracy, but what true freedom, even if only discuss - not talking about sharing ...! - if the mere discuss is prevented ?! And this said by a Nobel laureate has anything but weight told by "Tom Dick" with all due respect to all the "Tom Dick" in the world, has a different weight because it means that we are at a sort of "saturation point ".

"What do" then (the famous "Cto delat ). Two basic points: 1) there must be a space where we discuss the assumptions minority: they too must have a place, we have nothing against the dominant ideas, but we ask that minority ideas can compete , as now happens, never 2) science not save herself.

This point has raised questions, particularly in relation to the theory, very valid, barbers, which is nothing if not an amateur scientist. Josephson said he is well aware that many of the most important ideas of science, whose applications we see in everyday life, they came from scientists amateurs, but as science today, the chances that the ideas of an amateur to be discussed are "very poor" (this is a euphemism, of course ...). "Amateur" is not a bad word but it was not, but today it has become.

back to the point-based: the assumptions and also ideas must have a minority position, must be discussed openly, not in cliques. Must restart the process deadlocked for which the ideas of so-called "amateur" entered into discussions of the so-called "specialists", ie those who, by dint of "specialize" do not even know what the remote can be the "unexpected connections", that the discoveries true, and that now seem to be a religious belief and not knowledge "in research." Therefore, as Josephson has shown, have it with both religions: an account, Josephson said, is atheism as belief, is more like a sort of "cult". More than atheism, but the point is the epistemological paradigm rational, the real point is there.

Ultimately, the "amateur" who is testing "delight". And if you do not examine causes delight then you came in full-production-utilitarian vision that has contributed so much to make quest'umanità unhappy deep inside. This world is shaken by pain, but one of its main causes is in this false vision, set in the world, and for reasons that are anything but "economic".

Andrea A. Ianniello

Difference Between Clindamycin And Erthromycin

Psychopathic Romantics - altered

Psychopathic Romantics - wait [video]

http://www.myspace.com/psychopathicromantics

The group of "Psychopathic Romantics "(or" Romantix "as someone writes in a funny way), is a group field that has made an interesting CD in the Italian dish," Altered Education ", ie" Altered Education ", a title very appropriate at the time that you live. The CD was in 2007, last year, and was recorded in Tuscany. Undoubtedly, in relation to the sound that characterizes the average of the Italian groups, and Campania in particular, and bell-like dissonant bells wrong, this "washing clothes hive" has done them good, very good. The sounds are better, more polished sound. A glance at the titles of songs rather it gives a clear sense: " Altered Education", "Religion fines ( Fines of religion)," The Masses ( Assets ), "Fork in the Road ( Bivi Road), just to name a few. The basic theme is given its title suggests, the education "altered" of our times, a subject on which there is much to say, but see the CD, because it has interesting lyrics, all in English. The choice is debatable, but it is very effective in this case it is not usual, and ridiculous, mimicking the pseudo-English in illo tempore ", where the same Feyerabend did not want to introduce" new "policy, perhaps as foolish precedents, but it opened the door to different visions. Then the latter would enter into a competition, competition is not decided in any case "at the table" as they say. Returning to purely musical matters, the group has made a renewed search for that sound so-called "70s rock", but renewing it. This is the real sound of real rock, now largely ignored. In my opinion, this is an interesting choice, though only partially successful. There to say that the group to continue on the path of sonic refinement, rediscovering these sounds, but not for a vain and useless imitation, but to renew them, even deeply hybridization. Nothing is merely repeated, but instead, they are similarities, each in its own way and in different ways. Italic sort of croaking of magpies who crave such as red deer in heat, bright object of international success that English may induce, in contrast to the songs in Italian only, forcibly closed, like it or not, in Italy and in countries neo-Latin. Here is a genuine search for meaning, as well as assonance, which is necessary because the words can be adapted to the melody of the song. "'Join the masses' Said the priest:" "Join the masses,' said the priest." This seems to me a very significant phrase of the CD. Education is the one that altered befuddle today widespread, as has been said. the younger generation is thoroughly dazed in schools, public or private is only a matter of privilege, would love to discuss the "epistemological" or criteria of assessment of knowledge. We literally "stranded" as a ship on a sandbank, the epistemological paradigms of the nineteenth century, or, at most, the early twentieth century: If all goes well. It's not good at all! The real revolution would begin to affect those criteria "scientism" that govern our studies, mostly university students, to open to other criteria for judging the knowledge, as Feyerabend advised "

Andrea A. Ianniello